Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2018-05-16 21:21:31
- michaelkpate
- Moderator
- From: Avon Park, FL
- Registered: 2004-02-24
- Posts: 1,129
- Website
The First Five Years of Ghost
After 5 years and $3M, here’s everything we’ve learned from building Ghost
I remember trying it out when it was announced. I didn’t think it was that interesting and honestly kind of forgotten about it.
Michael K. Pate | Pate Technologies | Third Superpower
Offline
#2 2018-05-16 21:44:41
- philwareham
- Core designer
- From: Farnham, Surrey, UK
- Registered: 2009-06-11
- Posts: 3,112
- Website
Re: The First Five Years of Ghost
I was one of the Kickstarter backers back when Ghost was but a handful of photoshop visuals. And whilst it didn’t turn out exactly like those visuals I do keep a copy running locally out of interest. I quite like parts of it and the UI is pretty but I’ve never published a site with it. It’s more of a competitor to Medium than a CMS platform really.
Offline
#3 2018-05-17 10:35:24
- Destry
- Moderator
- From: Haut-Rhin
- Registered: 2004-08-04
- Posts: 4,061
- Website
Re: The First Five Years of Ghost
I also gave them 10 bucks in the original kickstarter for reasons beyond me now. I have some Ghost thing somewhere, judging by the occasional emails I get from them (fitting name, in fact), but I’ve never looked at it once. I too promptly forget about it, as I probably will after this post. Ultimately it’s just another centralized blog platform, and that’s why I can never bring myself to use it. The only centralizing I want to do anymore is publish my own writing on my own domain.
The text persuades, the *notes prove。
Offline
#4 2018-05-17 14:52:29
- gaekwad
- Member
- From: People's Republic of Cornwall
- Registered: 2005-11-19
- Posts: 2,402
Re: The First Five Years of Ghost
Destry wrote #311862:
Ultimately it’s just another centralized blog platform, and that’s why I can never bring myself to use it.
Well…not 100%. It’s open source, freely downloadable and readily-installable on many modern VPS-grade servers. Ghost Pro is the centralised version for $.
I did install Ghost myself some time ago, learned the basics of Nginx, Node, plus a few other bits…then realised I had nothing to write, had an existential crisis and powered off.
But yeah, looked nice, some of the GUI stuff was really nice – Insta-preview with Markdown was lovely.
Offline
#5 2018-05-18 07:23:31
- Destry
- Moderator
- From: Haut-Rhin
- Registered: 2004-08-04
- Posts: 4,061
- Website
Re: The First Five Years of Ghost
gaekwad wrote #311863:
Well…not 100%. It’s open source, freely downloadable and readily-installable on many modern VPS-grade servers. Ghost Pro is the centralised version for $.
Ah, that rings a bell. They had two offers. The platform is what I was thinking of. A kickstarter donation got you a spot on the platform. I’ve never used it. I wouldn’t even know how to find my account at this point. I guess I should find it, and kill it at least as part of my auditing.
some of the GUI stuff was really nice – Insta-preview with Markdown was lovely.
That also rings a bell. I think back when we had the mag running, I had an exchange with Mr. Dale in the Txp’s G+ community about the preview thing. He was not for split-screen previews, if I recall. I think I was proposing to him a For/Against double-article showdown for the magazine (you know, being the editor and looking for material), but I realized it was not going to be productive. Still, hard-click views are stable and effective. I have no problem with those either. ;)
I love preview, but I think swipe views are the best solution to them. Not fixed split screens, not tabbed or hard-click views like Txp, but swipeable views like iA Writer employs, as one excellent example, which you can also do with the table of contents if you’re writing multi-page pieces. Though it can be a little touchy at times; too easy to accidentally swipe.
The text persuades, the *notes prove。
Offline
#6 2018-05-18 15:49:25
- bici
- Member
- From: vancouver
- Registered: 2004-02-24
- Posts: 1,381
- Website
Re: The First Five Years of Ghost
michaelkpate wrote #311858:
After 5 years and $3M, here’s everything we’ve learned from building Ghost
I remember trying it out when it was announced. I didn’t think it was that interesting and honestly kind of forgotten about it.
i like this quote:
Unfortunately I think Github itself has a lot to do with this. The product has become too transactional – more support tool than collaboration. And Github themselves show remarkable disinterest in the open source community as a whole – they give us beta access to test new features every so often. That’s about it. There’s no wider involvement at all.
…. texted postive
Offline
#7 2018-05-18 16:51:17
- colak
- Admin
- From: Cyprus
- Registered: 2004-11-20
- Posts: 7,047
- Website
Re: The First Five Years of Ghost
Imagine how much our devs could do if they were offered $3M for 5 years. If Michael did not post about this here, I would have forgotten that Ghost actually exists.
Yiannis
——————————
neme.org | hblack.net | LABS | State Machines | NeMe @ github
Offline
Pages: 1